Compare and Assess Rawls and Nozick's Theories of Justice Essay

liken and Assess Rawls and Nozicks Theories of Justice - Essay ExampleBy using accessible induce as a device he formulated his hypothesis on ethical basis which has been instead opposing to the opinions of utilitarianism. He further provided justification about the concept of re- diffusion of wealth based upon the individualist assumptions. This philosophical control of Rawls has been quite inspirational for both the social democratic and the liberals. He also presented his theory on justice as fairness that highlighted two core principles i.e. Each person is to have an equal right to the most encompassing liberty compatible with a similar liberty for others (this principle reflects a traditional liberal committedness to formal equality) Social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both (a) to the sterling(prenominal) benefit of the least advantaged and (B) attached to positions and offices open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity (this so-called difference principle) points towards a significant measure of social inequality According to the Rawls theory the material inequalities can unaccompanied be justified when they are used to be of advantage to those who are least well-off. This theory of Rawls is well-matched to the concept of a market economy whereby the re-distribution of wealth is done in term of tax and welfare systems that last leads to disincentive to firms and ultimately turns out disadvantageous for the least well-off. The egalitarianism of Rawls is based on the social contract theory however there is also some contradiction as he starts with a precise liberal assumption about humans and then gives very broad conclusion in terms of egalitarianism considering distribution of wealth as fair by the people(hawk n.d.). Robert NozicksTheory of Anarchy, State and Utopia The major philosophical work presented by Robert Nozick was in 1974 as Anarchy, State and Utopia in which he presented a libert arianism point of view. According to this theory he rejects the belief of those having welfare views in terms of modern liberalism however he endorsed the concept of stripped-down state. Nozick placed his view of justice and equality upon the idea of entitlements and rights. This ideology is somewhat reflective of the notion of permeative thought presented by Aristotle and Plato in which they suggested that the material benefits should correspond to the worth of an individual. According the views presented on rights it is believed that the inequality in material is justifiable in this way that the talent and willingness of a person to work are raggedly distributed. The basis of Nozicks work is to distinguish between the historical principles of justice and the end-state principles. According to his view the needs of individuals and social equality are unjustifiable in relation to rewards. He gave the principles through which it can be frame whether the distribution of wealth is just, these principles are as 1. Wealth has to be justly acquired in the first place, that is, it should not have been stolen and the rights of others should not have been infringed 2. Wealth has to be justly transferred from one responsible person to some other 3. If wealth has been acquired or transferred unjustly this injustice should be rectified According to these principles Nozick justifies that the inequality in distribution of we